Opinion: Visit with migrant children reveals extent of outrage

By Andrew Cain

Originally published in the Mercury News on July 31, 2018. 

As leaders in legal advocacy for youth and immigrant children, my colleagues and I at the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley recently joined fellow lawyers, interpreters, social workers and other volunteers in visiting federal detention centers across the country where migrant children are being detained.

The primary purpose of our visits was to determine whether children being held by the U.S. government after crossing the border had access to the most basic provisions as outlined in the Flores Settlement Agreement, on which the Law Foundation serve as co-counsel.

The decades-old agreement governs the length of time and conditions under which children may be detained, and among other things requires they have access to clean water, are not kept in extreme temperatures, are fed healthy food and have a reasonably comfortable place to sleep.

The basics.

All together volunteers from across the country visited with and interviewed more than 200 migrant parents and their children.

What we found was shameful.

One 5-year-old girl who was covered in dirt and dust following a long walk through the desert wasn’t allowed to shower for six days.

A 15-year-old girl apprehended in late June said that there were 18 women and three mattresses in the overcrowded room were she was held at a center in Imperial, Calif.

At a facility in Tucson, each person was allotted one aluminum blanket. Children and their parents reported that they were often too cold to sleep at night.

And others reported being forced to use dirty toilets that were overflowing with waste.

Children seek refuge in the United States for many reasons. Some are fleeing from war. Others are trying to avoid gangs and violence. And others are escaping from abuse.

Whatever the circumstances, can you imagine coming to the United States for the first time as a child, expecting to finally arrive in a safe place, a place your parents or other trusted adults promised you wouldn’t be scared anymore, only to be thrown in a cold, hard cell and deprived of water and food?

Is this how we now treat children in the United States?

We say no.

And on Friday, U.S. Judge District Judge Dolly Gee honored our request for the appointment of an independent monitor to provide an objective assessment of the conditions at federal detention centers.

Until now, the Flores agreement allowed for a government-appointed monitor to inspect the facilities and file a report with the court to ensure the conditions are being met.

However, we questioned how we could trust a monitor appointed by the very same government that has demonstrated through its policies and practices that it does not care about the basic human rights of migrant children.

In order to ensure that children are treated with “dignity, respect and special concern for their particular vulnerability as minors” as the Flores agreement states, we appealed to the court to appoint someone who is independent.

Someone who won’t close their ears to the cries of a child who is hungry.

Someone who understands that children need baths.

Someone who knows that every child deserves a warm blanket and a safe and comfortable place to lay their head.

We are grateful to Judge Gee for her decision, and we will remain vigilant in fighting injustices against migrant children and their families in the court of law.

Because this is not how we treat children in the United States. Because we say no.

Andrew Cain is the directing attorney of Legal Advocates for Children and Youth, a program of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

Andrew's original piece can be found here

Law Foundation Gives Low-income Residents Voice in Google Development

Last year San Jose City entered into an exclusive negotiating agreement with Google to build a new campus in the city's downtown corridor. The development is expected to create 6 million to 8 million square feet of office space that will house at least 20,000 workers. 

For low-income people living in and around San Jose, displacement is all but guaranteed unless preventive measures are put into place. 

Earlier this year, San Jose City Council organized the Station Area Advisory Group, comprised of nearly 40 companies, neighborhood associations, individuals and non-profit organizations tasked with gathering and processing community input on the project, as well as other development in the Diridon Station Area.

As the only legal services provider invited to join the group, the Law Foundation is advocating for measures aimed at protecting low-income residents.

"After learning of Google's plans, we knew how important it was for the Law Foundation to advocate for equitable development in the Diridon corridor, meaning development where everyone has access to this incredible opportunity and no one is displaced," said Supervising Attorney Nadia Aziz.

"Most clients arrive at our office after they've received an eviction notice because their landlord is looking to cash-in on the housing boom. We are advocating to prevent the notice from being issued in the first place."

As part of the SAAG, the Law Foundation has advocated for solutions to the displacement crisis including advocating for affordable housing funding, a set-aside for affordable housing units, stronger tenant protections, and funding for relocation, emergency assistance and legal assistance for people who are displaced.

google SAAG - July 2018 newsletter.jpg

Q&A with Law Foundation Senior Attorney Kate Manning, Esq.

KateManning.jpg

Kate Manning has worked for the Law Foundation since 2007. She has experience representing children in family and probate court as well as individuals with physical and mental health disabilities. More recently, Kate's work has focused on securing residency for immigrant children who have crossed the U.S. border unaccompanied and who were abused, neglected or abandoned by their parents.

Kate received her undergraduate degree from UC Santa Barbara and attended law school at City University of New York.

Why did you become a legal aid lawyer? 

I was living in New York City after college and volunteering with CASA as a court-appointed special advocate. My role was to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children. At the time I wanted to be a social worker. The experience made me realize how important legal aid lawyers are to foster youth and children involved in the child welfare system. The lawyers gave these kids a voice, and it became very clear to me that I wanted to be that voice.

What is most meaningful to you about this work? 

Knowing we are helping kids feel safe. Some of the children I work with have been through such terrible things. They've been very badly abused by family or attacked by gang members. Whether we are giving them an opportunity to live permanently with a stable family member locally or as a legal immigrant in the U.S., we are providing them with a sense of safety they haven't experienced before. I feel really good about that.

What do you see as the greatest strength of the Law Foundation? 

To be able to provide legal services for free to people who otherwise wouldn't be able to access legal services at all. It sounds so simple, but legal aid has the power to transform lives.

What TV shows are you binge-watching these days? 

Stranger Things and Peaky Blinders

What do you enjoy doing when you're not working? 

When I'm not working I'm usually driving my kids around. Otherwise I enjoy hanging out with my kids at the pool, hiking, backpacking and biking.